|
Obama And
Mexico Why
it matters how much the new president cares about
Latin America
I hope the election of Barack Obama to the
presidency of the
United States signals better
relations with Latin America, of which Mexico is a leading player. One
would hope a change is around the bend, but much will depend on
the Obama administration’s views on the importance of the region
relative to the other problems inherited domestically and around
the world.
By moving quickly with the Spanish-
speaking half of this hemisphere, Obama has a rare opportunity
to capitalize on his personal popularity, something he gained
directly as a result of an accomplishment that was seen as
astonishing in Latin America.
For now he is viewed as a man of the people, an underdog who
conquered the world’s highest political peak.
If the problems in the Middle East, Asia
and Europe push Latin America to the back burner (as happened
through much of President George Bush’s two terms), the
opportunity to capitalize on his larger-than-life persona will
be lost.
Most San Diegans – and our counterparts
across the country – see domestic economic ills as Obama’s
highest priority. Once the economy has been cared for, then
their president can proceed to a multitude of other internal
issues. After that come foreign policy matters in far-off
countries where war is not likely.
To San Diegans,
Mexico
is not a far-off destination, but most officials in
Washington,
D.C., don’t view relations with that nation,
and particularly Baja
California, as part of a grand foreign
relations scheme. The stars are in Europe, Asia and the
Middle East. Mexico
is simply
Mexico
and the relations are sometimes good and sometimes bad.
We in San Diego
are unhappy with
Mexico. We avoid visiting Baja
because of the almost daily reports of violence in the
continuing government war against drug barons. We hold Mexico
accountable for the criminal activities occurring in Baja and
give little thought to the root of the problem, which is that
mobsters are killing themselves and those in their way for the
right to supply our drug consumers with their illicit smuggled
cargo.
Other crimes, such as kidnappings of
Mexican business people (a few with residences in
San Diego), are a Mexican problem that
the government has failed to adequately address. But even here,
it is often incorrectly portrayed (or hinted) that the majority
of victims are
U.S.
citizens.
Somewhat offsetting that are the very
robust international business, social, cultural and educational
communities in San Diego with
various ties with Baja California
and the rest of
Mexico. These groups do wonders
to keep the flow of business, education, social and cultural
exchanges going in trying times.
So we have two distinct but interwoven
binational situations in
San Diego. The first comes from
Washington’s foreign policy; the second is
San Diego’s relations and policy with
Baja California.
The Obama cabinet has two Hispanic members,
but neither has expertise or much experience in U.S.-Mexico
affairs. Former Congresswoman Hilda Solis as labor secretary is
best known for championing the environment and workers’ rights.
And former Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar as interor secretary has
little to say or do with foreign policy. It’s a shame that New
Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson had to decline the position of
commerce secretary due to an unrelated conflict of interest
investigation. He truly understands the border and would have
been in a position to provide the new president with
extraordinarily wise counsel.
A lack of influential advocates aside, if
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stays true to her campaign
promise and that of Obama’s by bringing NAFTA back for another
round of “negotiations,” we could well be faced with a drawn-out
adversarial trade confrontation with Mexico and Canada.
Not all is bleak. Latin American
consultants Frank Sanchez and Dan Restrepo, both well versed and
possessing excellent credentials, joined Obama early in his
campaign and will serve in his administration. The big important
unknown is who will be named as ambassadors to the various Latin
American countries.
Don’t expect much Latin American influence
from San Diego. The local
congressional delegation, consisting of two Democrats and three
Republicans, seems frozen when it comes to acting as a team on
border issues. Each appears to have individual biases to go
along with an independent agenda tied to political philosophies.
The region likely will depend on Reps. Susan Davis and Bob
Filner, both Democrats, to bring to the president’s attention
our region’s binational needs and possibilities for economic
progress on both sides of the border.
The new president takes office at a time
when the border region urgently needs champions to push forward
projects that will create billions of dollars of businesses. The
proposed new port of entry — East Otay Mesa or Otay Mesa II —
will by itself boost the regional economy by more than $3
billion. Another project with economic windfall possibilities is
a San Diego
airport terminal annex at Otay Mesa with a bridge connecting to
the Tijuana airport. If done
correctly, this would deliver direct trans-Pacific flights to
both San Diego and
Tijuana
without expansion of Lindbergh Field. Also in the works is the
modernization of the San Ysidro port of entry, an effort that
may finally cut down the excruciating multi-hour wait times for
northbound traffic. Those delays cost the Baja-San Diego economy
billions of dollars, not to mention the negative effect on air
quality from thousands of idling trucks and cars.
We could use the breath of fresh air that
would come from shortening waits, and its equivalent in
enlightened new policy out of Washington, D.C.
Patrick Osio Jr. can be reached at
posiojr@aol.com. The veteran consultant has
participated on writing scripts for documentaries on
Baja California
real estate, medical services, and retirement information at
TransBorderCommunications.com.
This article first appeared on the February
2009 issue of the San Diego Metropolitan Magazine.
|