|
June 2009
A
Letter To Alan Bersin
There’s more to the
border
than fences, drugs and guns
As
President Obama’s first border czar, Alan Bersin will have
extraordinary influence on the lives and livelihoods of tens of
thousands of San Diego
and Baja residents and the regional economy. We have some hopes
and wishes, presented here in letter form.
Dear Mr.
Bersin:
“It would be
presumptuous to suggest that you need communication of facts and
knowledge regarding U.S.-Mexico border issues, when you are
probably the most prepared individual to assume the office of
assistant secretary for international affairs and special
representative for border affairs, commonly referred as border
czar. We dare here to bring your attention to frequently, if not
totally ignored issues of great importance to the binational
border communities and to remind you that during your last
posting (1995 through 1998), some decisions with great
consequences were made, many based on the day’s political whims.
The
international border marks a line between two sovereign
countries. Because it is a political line, it can be subject to
the whims of the corresponding governments.
As you know,
border crossing issues historically have, with few exceptions,
been associated with economics. Economic issues include both the
wanted and unwanted border crossings:
From
Mexico
to the United
States
you have commercial crossings, visitor crossings, illegal
immigration smuggling and illicit drug smuggling.
From the United States to Mexico you have commercial
crossings, visitor crossings, arms and ammunition smuggling and
hazardous waste smuggling.
“All of these
are rooted in economics. The first two types of crossings are
welcomed by both countries, while the two others are the subject
of law enforcement attempts by both nations.
During the
years of absence from your present post, 1998-2009, a great
number of changes have taken place and a new reality was created
by the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Terrorism
introduced a new border crossing issue not rooted on economics –
those legally or illegally entering the nation for the sole
purpose of causing death and destruction.
Confronted
with this reality, policymakers were totally unprepared to
adjust and secure the borders. The political establishment, for
reasons not necessary to discuss here, concluded this new
problem of insecurity was singularly due to the U.S.-Mexico
border. This led to an array of federal legislation, most of it
not well thought out.
Unfortunately, these new laws negatively affected only the first
and second reasons to cross the border, leaving almost untouched
the third and fourth.
Mr. Bersin,
when Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano appointed you
April 15, she said: ‘He will lead the efforts to make our
borders safe while working to promote commerce and trade.’
Here, Mr.
Bersin, is our concern. “…while working to promote commerce and
trade.” Thus far all the activity at the border has impeded
commerce and trade, of which visitors are an important factor.
While the positive rhetoric on promoting commerce and trade
always finds its way into speeches, too often it is backed by
little substance.
For instance,
border wait times that have for decades been one of the most
detrimental obstacles to ‘trade and commerce’ may now start to
diminish, thanks to new efforts taking place. But offsetting
this potential are recently enacted laws governing crossing to
and from
Mexico
that will more than offset whatever time saving border changes
are presently under construction.
It seems that
addressing the real root of the border crossing delays is not
part of the political will. The simplicity of having border
inspectors not take more than 15 to 20 seconds with each car
seems to be a “good idea” but it was never properly implemented.
Also not realized was a smart plan to place a computer directed
“Red Light” system that randomly selects cars to be sent to
secondary, thus bypassing the potential renegade inspectors. By
itself, this simple and logical improvement would immediately
cut down waiting times by 30 to 40 minutes.
Mr. Bersin,
you are most certainly aware of the Sandag and California
Department of Transportation economic study indicating that
border wait times have tremendous negative economic impact on
both sides of the border, as much as $5 billion loss in San
Diego and $3 billion loss along the Baja Pacific Coast.
Your office
is positioned to in a very pragmatic and positive way do a great
deal to improve the economic situation along both sides of the
border. It is economic development that creates jobs, trade and
commerce and security.
“Here is
wishing you the best in your tenure. Our border economy needs
you.
Patrick Osio Jr. can be
reached at posiojr@aol.com.
The veteran consultant has participated on writing scripts for
documentaries on
Baja California
real estate, medical services, and retirement information at
TransBorderCommunications.com.
This article first appeared on the June 2009
issue of the San Diego Metropolitan Magazine.
|