October
9, 2000
Since 1973, term-limits have
served Chula Vista well.
By Patrick Osio, Jr.
In state after state,
whenever term-limits for the governor's office
and legislative bodies have been placed on
ballots, voters have resoundingly approved the
measure. Political bodies and special interest
lobbyists use whatever methods and influence at
their disposal to keep such measures from the
ballot, and when unsuccessful, they plow large
amounts of political contributions in futile
attempts to defeat the referendum.
Lost in the high-profile
state and federal term-limits debate is the
municipal term-limits movement fast spreading
throughout the country. Voters in nearly 3,000
cities have imposed term-limits on their elected
officials. Cities like New York, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, Dallas, Houston, Washington D.C,
Denver, New Orleans, Cincinnati, Kansas City, and
San Diego are among the more recognized, but the
list includes Chula Vista.
When placed on ballots,
voters have approved municipal term-limits by an
average of 70 per cent in favor, a higher
percentage than those for state office term-limits.
Against the national
populist current, Chula Vista's political body
wants voters to rescind its Charter's term-limit
restriction on Election Day, November 7, 2000. To
play safe, voters are given two choices: One, do
away with term-limits altogether. Or Two, what
they hope is more palatable, change the limit to
three-terms instead of the present two-term
restriction. Voters will be able to vote yes or
no on one or both measures.
Since 1973 the City Charter
has limited the Mayor and City Council members to
no more than two four-year terms. A council
member can serve two city council terms (8 years),
and if elected to mayor, can serve two terms (8
years) in that capacity.
Is the City's present
political body suggesting that all those who in
the last 27 years served under term-limits failed
to properly represent Chula Vista? Are the Mayor
and city council members who support the measure
willing to look at voters in the eye and say they
are indispensable? That Chula Vista's future is
doomed without their leadership?
Of course, Shirley Horton is
a good mayor, but so was Greg Cox, and he is
today a good Supervisor. Of course, Patty Davis
is a good council-member, but so was Shirley
Horton when she was in the council. And like
them, new citizens will step up, some will go on
to higher office, others will serve their terms
and go back to private life.
And those who feel they
still have more to contribute at the city level,
after four years out of office, can ask the
voters to give them another chance. That's a good
rule. Cities need Citizen Legislators, not
Professional Politicians.
The arguments for doing away
with the limits are not new, and are routinely
soundly rejected by voters everywhere.
Exaggerated claims that experience is what
counts; without it the city will lose out; it
takes years of experience to learn; limits are
not needed, voters can retire a candidate with
their vote, and on the common to every city
litany goes.
Communities such as Chula
Vista is where it all starts. Here is where good
and caring citizens begin community activism and
service. Those voted to city council have
typically served in various volunteer capacities
in city commissions, such as in the Planning, or
Economic Development. And, or they have risen to
positions of leadership within their local
service or professional organizations, and have
won community recognition. They are ready to
become Citizen Legislators.
Since 1973, every elected
Mayor has first served in City Council, acquiring
the needed experience to be a solid Mayor. Greg
Cox and Shirley Horton are proof of the
effectiveness and wisdom of Chula Vista's 1973
visionaries.
Throughout the country
voters are approving term-limits because, as
history has most often shown, unrestrained terms
turn Citizen Legislators into Professional
Politicians, whose main goal becomes winning
reelections.
*********
Patrick Osio, Jr. writes for HispanicVista.com
(www.hispanicvista.com)
and The Connection column for the San Diego
Metropolitan Magazine.
|